Head to head
site-spec vs pseolint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server: audit any website for SEO, accessibility, and AI-searchability, then auto-fix it.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Penalty-risk audit for programmatic SEO sites: verdict, risk score, and a fix manifest.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 82 out of 100).
| site-spec | pseolint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 7 |
| Downloads / week | 28 | 58 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 4 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |