Head to head
Appwrite vs Run402
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Build and deploy backends: auth, Postgres/MySQL/vector databases, storage, functions, hosting, CDN
Full listing
No reviews yet
x402 pay-per-call infra for agents: $0.03 image generation, Postgres, auth, storage, functions.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Appwrite (99/100 against 84).
| Appwrite | Run402 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 72 | 24 |
| Downloads / week | 39k | 3.5k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |