Head to head
Neon Zero-Trust Gateway vs Supabase
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Zero-Trust MCP gateway securing internal database tools behind an API key firewall.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (100/100 against 40). Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.
| Neon Zero-Trust Gateway | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | D40/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 2.9k |
| Downloads / week | – | 76k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |