Mmcp.market

Head to head

Neon Zero-Trust Gateway vs Magic Cloud

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Neon Zero-Trust Gatewayio.github.Ansarii/zero-trust-gateway
D
No reviews yet

Zero-Trust MCP gateway securing internal database tools behind an API key firewall.

Full listing
Magic Cloudio.github.polterguy/magic
A
No reviews yet

Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Magic Cloud (88/100 against 40). Neon Zero-Trust Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; Magic Cloud runs on your own machine. Magic Cloud has noticeably more public adoption.

 Neon Zero-Trust GatewayMagic Cloud
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeD40/100A88/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars01.2k
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release2026-09-152026-09-18
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

Neon Zero-Trust Gateway vs SupabaseNeon Zero-Trust Gateway vs MCP Toolbox for DatabasesNeon Zero-Trust Gateway vs GeoLensNeon Zero-Trust Gateway vs NeonNeon Zero-Trust Gateway vs PostgreSQLAll Databases servers