Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Trooth

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditorio.github.Ansarii/mcp-security-auditor
B
No reviews yet

Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.

Full listing
Troothio.github.trooth-eng/trooth-network
A
No reviews yet

Look up a witnessed Trust Profile, read a domain's security surface, or verify a Trust Ledger Token.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trooth (85/100 against 75).

 MCP Security & Vulnerability AuditorTrooth
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB75/100A85/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars00
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools—4
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-17
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs MCPProxyMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs dns-doctorMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Reversecore MCPMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs secobserve-mcpMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs DraugrAll Security servers