Head to head
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs dns-doctor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Scan, fix, verify and monitor DNS: SPF, DMARC, DKIM, propagation, health, expiry. Validated fixes.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours dns-doctor (87/100 against 75). dns-doctor has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor | dns-doctor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A87/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 346 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 20 |
| Write actions | — | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Security | Security |
Other comparisons
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs MCPProxyMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs spintax.net MCP serverMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs npm Registry MCP ServerMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Reversecore MCPMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs mcp-debeziumAll Security servers