Head to head
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs spintax.net MCP server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Write, validate, render and analyze spintax templates. Backed by @spintax/core. No auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours spintax.net MCP server (92/100 against 75). spintax.net MCP server has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor | spintax.net MCP server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 441 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |
Other comparisons
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security PreflightMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs grim-mcpMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security Txt Cra LintMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs DraugrMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs ScanLabsAI Security ScannerAll Security servers