Mmcp.market

Head to head

AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs Agent Comms

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiterio.github.Ansarii/mcp-rate-limiter
F
No reviews yet

Token guard and rate limiter preventing runaway API cost spikes for OpenAI and Anthropic.

Full listing
Agent Commsio.github.ExaDev/agent-comms
A
No reviews yet

Cross-harness communication mesh for LLM agents — rooms, DMs, presence, and visibility over TCP

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent Comms (94/100 against 17). AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agent Comms runs on your own machine. Agent Comms has noticeably more public adoption.

 AI API Cost Firewall & Rate LimiterAgent Comms
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeF17/100A94/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–21
Downloads / week–14k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs ha-mcpAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs IWEAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs fiori-mcp-serverAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs mcp-local-ragAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers