Mmcp.market

Head to head

AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs mcp-local-rag

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiterio.github.Ansarii/mcp-rate-limiter
F
No reviews yet

Token guard and rate limiter preventing runaway API cost spikes for OpenAI and Anthropic.

Full listing
mcp-local-ragio.github.shinpr/mcp-local-rag
A
No reviews yet

Easy-to-setup local RAG server with minimal configuration

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-local-rag (92/100 against 17). AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-local-rag runs on your own machine. mcp-local-rag has noticeably more public adoption.

 AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limitermcp-local-rag
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeF17/100A92/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–399
Downloads / week–4.7k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs ha-mcpAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs IWEAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs fiori-mcp-serverAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs mcp-ts-coreAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs mockserverAll AI and agents servers