Mmcp.market

Head to head

AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs agent-device

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiterio.github.Ansarii/mcp-rate-limiter
F
No reviews yet

Token guard and rate limiter preventing runaway API cost spikes for OpenAI and Anthropic.

Full listing
agent-deviceio.github.callstack/agent-device
C
No reviews yet

MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours agent-device (55/100 against 17). AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter is hosted and callable through the gateway; agent-device runs on your own machine. agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.

 AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiteragent-device
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeF17/100C55/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–4.7k
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

AI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs ha-mcpAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs IWEAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs fiori-mcp-serverAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs mcp-local-ragAI API Cost Firewall & Rate Limiter vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers