Mmcp.market

Head to head

Contextforge vs Agent Harnesses

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Contextforgeio.github.alfredoizdev/contextforge-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot.

Full listing
Agent Harnessesio.github.RyanAlberts/agent-harnesses
A
No reviews yet

Agent-harness picks and decision guides; pick_infrastructure adds live GitHub/HN discovery.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent Harnesses (92/100 against 83). Agent Harnesses has noticeably more public adoption.

 ContextforgeAgent Harnesses
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars2906
Downloads / week59–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools6910
Write actions25—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITCC-BY-SA-4.0
Last release2026-09-042026-09-19
CategoryDeveloper toolsDeveloper tools

Other comparisons

Contextforge vs GitHubContextforge vs uploads.shContextforge vs PalinodeContextforge vs NexusmemContextforge vs okffsAll Developer tools servers