Mmcp.market

Head to head

Contextforge vs GitHub

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Contextforgeio.github.alfredoizdev/contextforge-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot.

Full listing
GitHubio.github.github/github-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GitHub (98/100 against 83). GitHub is hosted and callable through the gateway; Contextforge runs on your own machine. GitHub has noticeably more public adoption.

 ContextforgeGitHub
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A98/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars233k
Downloads / week59–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools69—
Write actions25—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-042026-09-16
CategoryDeveloper toolsDeveloper tools

Other comparisons

Contextforge vs uploads.shContextforge vs PalinodeContextforge vs Agent HarnessesContextforge vs NexusmemContextforge vs okffsAll Developer tools servers