Mmcp.market

Head to head

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs Projectmem

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewallio.github.alexar76/warden
A
No reviews yet

MCP security firewall: vet tool definitions before they reach the model.

Full listing
Projectmemio.github.riponcm/projectmem
A
No reviews yet

Coding agent memory — one local MCP server for every project. Warns before repeating failed fixes.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 92 out of 100). Projectmem has noticeably more public adoption.

 WARDEN — MCP Security FirewallProjectmem
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars0827
Downloads / week51–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools617
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-052026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs MCPWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs HOL GuardWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs DvalincodeWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs runxWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs LockstepAll AI and agents servers