Mmcp.market

Head to head

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewallio.github.alexar76/warden
A
No reviews yet

MCP security firewall: vet tool definitions before they reach the model.

Full listing
MCPcom.decionis/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Authorize consequential AI agent actions before execution

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 99 out of 100). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 WARDEN — MCP Security FirewallMCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A99/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0533
Downloads / week51297
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools6—
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-052026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs HOL GuardWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs DvalincodeWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs ProjectmemWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs runxWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs LockstepAll AI and agents servers