Head to head
AgentAvow Trust vs Revit Model
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Signed, offline-verifiable safety scores for the MCP servers, packages & tools an agent connects to
Full listing
No reviews yet
The Python package exposes Revit tools over MCP stdio, read-only by default.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Revit Model (92/100 against 75). AgentAvow Trust is hosted and callable through the gateway; Revit Model runs on your own machine. Revit Model has noticeably more public adoption.
| AgentAvow Trust | Revit Model | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 424 | 308 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 8 | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |