Head to head
AgentAvow Trust vs Claudinho
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Signed, offline-verifiable safety scores for the MCP servers, packages & tools an agent connects to
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live 2026 World Cup scores, fixtures & standings for your AI agent. No keys. Unofficial fan project.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Claudinho (92/100 against 75). AgentAvow Trust is hosted and callable through the gateway; Claudinho runs on your own machine. Claudinho has noticeably more public adoption.
| AgentAvow Trust | Claudinho | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 29 |
| Downloads / week | 424 | 433 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 8 | 9 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |