Head to head
af360 vs Netdata
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Watches your local projects and sites read-only and names what would be lost.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Real-time infrastructure monitoring with metrics, logs, alerts, and ML-based anomaly detection.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Netdata (88/100 against 68). Netdata is hosted and callable through the gateway; af360 runs on your own machine. Netdata has noticeably more public adoption.
| af360 | Netdata | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 81k |
| Downloads / week | 235 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | UNLICENSED | GPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |