Head to head
af360 vs jCodemunch MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Watches your local projects and sites read-only and names what would be lost.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (68 and 66 out of 100). jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| af360 | jCodemunch MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | C66/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 2.7k |
| Downloads / week | 235 | 6.0k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | UNLICENSED | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |