
Pakistan Case Law MCP server
Search 197,000+ Pakistani judgments by keyword, citation, or the legal question they settle.
Little public usage data yet
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Pakistan Case Law yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Pakistan Case Law tools (7)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postscaselaw_get_caseFreeFetch one judgment by id. section='summary' (default) returns metadata + the AI headnote (plain-language summary, the laws/provisions referred, and keyword tags) — read this first to judge relevance cheaply. section='full' additionally returns the judgment body text (capped at ~40,000 chars; the response flags body_truncated/body_chars_total when longer).
caselaw_get_citationsFreeWalk the citation graph FORWARD: list the in-corpus cases that THIS judgment cites (the precedents it relied on). Combine with caselaw_get_cited_by to traverse precedent backward and forward until a research question is resolved. Most useful on RECENT judgments: a 2024-25 case usually has nobody citing it yet, but its own citation list is a curated map of the established authority on the point.
caselaw_get_cited_byFreeWalk the citation graph BACKWARD: list later cases that cite THIS judgment (how it was subsequently treated — followed, distinguished, relied upon). Returns newest first. Most useful on OLDER or landmark judgments: it shows whether the case is still followed and where the principle has been applied since. A leading case can have hundreds of citing cases.
caselaw_lookup_citationFreeFind the judgment(s) at an exact law-report citation. Example: journal='PLD', year=1995, page=34 → PLD 1995 Supreme Court 34. Omit page to list everything reported in that journal+year. Returns the same case shape as caselaw_search.
caselaw_most_citedFreeList the most-cited (landmark) judgments in the corpus, ranked by how many other cases cite them. A good entry point for the leading authorities on Pakistani law.
caselaw_searchFreeFull-text search of 230,000+ Pakistani judgments (Supreme Court & High Courts, 1970–2025). Ranking follows how lawyers research: nearness to the legal point decides which cases are returned; among comparably-near cases, more senior court > larger bench > more recent > more cited. Use sort='newest' when you need the current state of the law (later judgments supersede as statutes are amended), or sort='court' for the most authoritative first. Returns ranked cases with id, title, citation, court, year, a snippet, and the public URL. For an exact report citation use caselaw_lookup_citation. To read a case, pass its id to caselaw_get_case.
caselaw_search_questionsFreeFind judgments by the QUESTION they settle, rather than by words they contain. Every AI summary on this corpus records the questions that judgment actually decides — e.g. "Does delay in lodging the FIR by itself entitle the accused to bail?" This searches those questions, so it matches the shape a legal problem arrives in rather than the vocabulary a 1987 bench happened to use. COVERAGE IS PARTIAL: only some judgments have an AI summary with questions yet (the response's `coverage_note` gives the current live ratio, which keeps growing). An empty result means no *summarised* judgment matched — it does NOT mean no such judgment exists. Fall back to caselaw_search, which covers the whole corpus. The questions are written by an AI reading the judgment. They are a finding aid, not a holding: cite the judgment, never the question. Pass an id to caselaw_get_case to read it.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 2048ms17/20
- Tool poisoning7 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Install directly
claude mcp add --transport http caselaw https://pakistancaselaw.com/mcp
Pakistan Case Law: common questions
- Is Pakistan Case Law MCP server safe?
- With care: it is graded C, so read the findings first (65/100). Read the Pakistan Case Law safety report
- How do I install Pakistan Case Law?
- It runs remotely at pakistancaselaw.com. Add it to Claude Code, Claude Desktop or Cursor with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does Pakistan Case Law need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Pakistan Case Law maintained?
- The latest release is v1.3.0.
- Is Pakistan Case Law up?
- 100% of our last 6 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- What can I use instead of Pakistan Case Law?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Keyword Research MCP server, Cite42 MCP server and Google Ads + Meta Ads + SEO/GEO MCP server. Compare all Pakistan Case Law alternatives.
Alternatives to Pakistan Case Law
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- Keyword ResearchKeyword ideas and question discovery for any seed term - volumes, difficulty, and SERP intent.not reviewedNewA
- Cite42AI visibility, brand rankings, citations, SEO keywords, trends, and scheduled prompt trackers.not reviewedNewB
Google Ads + Meta Ads + SEO/GEO MCPGoogle Ads, Meta Ads, SEO, GEO & GA4 MCP by Ryze AI - audits, reports, keywords, Search Console.not reviewedEstablishedA- Scholar FeedRank CS/AI/ML papers by citations, forecast impact, or code adoption; trace 23.2M citation edges.not reviewedEstablishedB
- HasData TikTokPublic TikTok profiles, videos, comments and keyword search as JSON. No developer account.not reviewedGrowingA