Mmcp.market

Is Agent Cold Email MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A87/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 low
  • Code scan14 source files scanned25/25
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 781ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning28 tool descriptions checked13/15
  • Auth qualityAPI key sent as a header8/15
  • Maintenancelast push 28 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

Findings (1)

  • lowUnusually long tool description (over 2,000 characters)poison.long-description
    tool setup_infrastructure: …Provision sending infrastructure: buy branded lookalike domains, create mailboxes, start warmup. New mailboxes are ramp-limited server-side — 5 sends/day in week 1, rising to 40/day after 4 weeks — and your own calls cannot exceed that cap; poll infrastructure_status for the current dailyCap. Inputs: brand, primaryDomain, domains + inboxesEach counts, persona, physicalAddress, senderIdentity. Billing is per-provisioned-mailbox ($10/mailbox + $49 platform, min 5) and the billed quantity follows what you provision here — pass quoteOnly:true first to preview the new count + projected monthly price before committing (no silent capacity addition). Every response carries a `billing` projection { provisionedAfter (the live count AFTER this call — reality, not the ask), projectedMonthlyCents, formula }: on quoteOnly it's the preview, on an actual provision it's the real post-provision bill (a capacity-limited partial reflects only what landed). Returns { jobId, billing } — `jobId` is a correlation id only, not a trackable job handle: there is no job store and no endpoint that accepts it, so do not poll for it or treat its presence as meaningful; it exists to correlate this response with logs. A `provisioning` field is present ONLY when the call returned still OWING work, and names which state: 'pending' (a domain's DNS registration is still completing — `pendingDomain` names one of them) or 'capacity_pending' (held at a spend/plan-slot limit, so polling will NOT progress until an operator raises it — call contact_operator instead of waiting). Its ABSENCE is what says the provision finished; the only way to find out is to re-call setup_infrastructure or read infrastructure_status's `nextSteps`. An outcome carrying `provisioning`, and a quoteOnly preview, are deliberately NOT recorded against your idempotencyKey — retrying with the same key re-runs the call and finishes the job rather than replaying the unfinished answer. `domains` and `inboxesEach` are the infrastructure you want to HAVE, not an amount to add: each call keeps and resumes what this account already has and buys only the shortfall, so to provision MORE you ask for a LARGER number (domains:2 after a call that provisioned one buys the second; raising inboxesEach tops each domain up). Repeating a call therefore never buys twice, whatever you do with idempotencyKey — resend it, change it, or omit it. The key controls response replay only and has no bearing on what is purchased, so a retry is always safe. A domain this account already registered but that never landed in your account (a prior call that failed after the purchase) is ADOPTED on the retry at zero extra cost rather than bought again. A domain whose DNS setup has not finished yet is recorded and never lost — there is no per-domain DNS field to poll (infrastructure_status reports a domain count, not per-domain detail), so read its `nextSteps` for what to do next, and repeat this same call to converge on the domain and finish its DNS setup. Slot semantics: `domains: N` covers ordinals 0..N-1, and each ordinal fills to its own mailbox count (uniform via `inboxesEach`, or per-ordinal via `distribution` — see below); a repeat call at the SAME `domains` provisions nothing new once every ordinal is satisfied, so reaching ordinal 1 needs `domains:2`, not a second `domains:1` call. Mailbox addresses are DETERMINISTIC — derived from `persona` + ordinal + slot — so keep `persona` EXACTLY as it was on a resume or retry; changing it mid-account does not move existing addresses but does change what a NEW ordinal derives. `distribution` (optional, alternative to `inboxesEach`) names the per-ordinal mailbox count directly — one entry per domain ordinal, e.g. `[3, 2]` for 3 mailboxes on domain 0 and 2 on domain 1 — for a shape `inboxesEach`'s single uniform number cannot express; supply exactly one of the two (an array with `domains` entries, or the uniform count). `registerDomains` is this tenant's opt-in consent to real domain purchases made on the platform's own account (our COGS — your bill is unchanged, mailbox-count-based only); only the operator's own global switch being armed too can ever actually enable it. OMITTING it leaves any consent you previously gave UNCHANGED — pass `false` explicitly to revoke it. A call that omits `registerDomains` (or sends it `false`) on a buy-bearing request (one that needs to purchase a new domain) is refused BEFORE any spend. Once this account has consented at least once, that refusal is a 400 `registrar_optin_missing`: 'registerDomains was not set on this request' — resend the identical call with it set to true to self-correct; this is never an operator escalation. (An account that has never consented, on a platform where domain registration is not yet enabled at all, instead sees the operator-facing 503 `registrar_unarmed` — indistinguishable from the outside except by status code, but the fix is the same: set `registerDomains: true` and retry.) Separately, a `registerDomains:true` call with NO `registrant` anywhere (neither in this request nor persisted from a prior one) fails with a 400 `incomplete_registrant` naming the missing fields — also before any purchase. Fresh candidates are de-duplicated against what this account already owns and checked for availability; if a call needs to buy a domain and no available un-owned candidate exists it fails with a 400 naming that, never a silent repeat purchase (a call that needs to buy nothing is unaffected). `registrant` (a full registrant-of-record object { firstName, lastName, email, phone, addressLine1, city, state, country, postalCode, organization (optional, defaults to brand) }) is OPTIONAL even when `registerDomains` is true whenever a complete registrant is already on file from a prior call — supplying one makes it authoritative for THIS call; omitting it re-uses the persisted one. This platform never invents a domain registrant's legal identity, so a call with no registrant anywhere (neither supplied nor persisted) is rejected naming the missing fields, at or before the actual purchase — never silently. There is NO background retry: a call returning `provisioning` needs the caller to retry it; the platform does not complete it for you on a timer. Every response carries `nextSteps` (see the discriminated `status`/`steps` shape) — the account's own next action, computed fresh each time, so a stalled setup is never silent.…
Overall 87/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Agent Cold Email does

  • Superagnt
    AI agent toolkit: live social media data, lead enrichment + email finder, Postgres DB, webhooks.
    A
  • ZOOQ - LinkedIn Data for AI Agents
    Live LinkedIn data for AI agents: profiles, companies, jobs, posts, email finding. No account risk.
    A
  • WarmySender
    AI-agent outreach: cold email, warmup, LinkedIn, Instagram, WhatsApp, verification, 200M leads
    B

Agent Cold Email reviews, tools and install