Is NVIDIA AI CKG MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-24 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan54 source files scanned20/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 973ms20/20
- Tool poisoning9 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenancerepository not readable: repo not found3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalckg_nvidia_ai-0.16.4/site/assets/javascripts/lunr/wordcut.js: … __p;\n'; try { var render = new Function(settings.variable || 'obj', '_', source)…
Overall 70/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what NVIDIA AI CKG does
- Codebase MemoryCodebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.not reviewedWidely usedC
TraceCode graph MCP: 81 languages, 88 frameworks, 72.7% fewer PR-review tokens, comprehension at paritynot reviewedEstablishedA- HonchoMemory that reasons: continual learning for stateful agents. Better context, fewer tokens.not reviewedEstablishedA