Is WattScope MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 300ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 70/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what WattScope does
- ContextStream MCP ServerProject memory, semantic code search, and grounded agent context.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Google SurfWeb, academic and code search with graph RAG, data lineage, ontology and cross-project schema links.not reviewedEstablishedB
- SkillsmithShare agent skills across your team, scan them for risk, and track what's actually used.not reviewedEstablishedB