Mmcp.market

Is FoxForm MCP server safe?

Probably. Read the findings first.

C61/100grade C

Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 low
  • Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 1094ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning10 tool descriptions checked13/15
  • Auth qualityAPI key sent as a header8/15
  • Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
  • Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10

Findings (2)

  • lowUnusually long tool description (over 2,000 characters)poison.long-description
    tool foxform_get_form: …Fetch a single form by ID, including its full question list, per-screen conditional logic and settings. Args: - form_id (string): the form's ID (from foxform_list_forms) - response_format ('markdown' | 'json') Returns { form, public_url }: the full form object (id, title, description, slug, status, theme, questions[], thank_you_message, timestamps) plus `public_url` — the public link (`https://forms.foxform.app/<slug>`), which is live only when status is 'published'. Use `public_url` verbatim; never build the URL yourself (the public domain is forms.foxform.app, not foxform.app). Each screen in `questions[]` carries its own `logic` (branching / conditional display) and, for choice screens, `choices[]`/`images[]` with their `points` and `value`. The markdown output summarises every rule; use response_format 'json' to get the exact stored objects (that's the shape foxform_update_form expects back). CONDITIONAL LOGIC (branching), per screen — stored in `questions[].logic`: logic.conditionalNavigationV2 = { enabled: true, groups: [ // groups are OR-joined; FIRST matching group wins { id: "grp-1", conditions: [ // conditions inside a group are AND-joined { id: "cond-1", left: "{{quer_testar}}", operator: "equal_to", right: "Ainda não" } ], then: { type: "specific_screen", targetScreenId: "s-motivos" } } ] } - `then.type`: 'next_screen' | 'previous_screen' | 'specific_screen' (needs targetScreenId = another screen's `id`) | 'end_form'. Add `then.url` (+ optional `openNewTab`) to redirect to an external URL instead. - `operator`: 'equal_to' | 'not_equal_to' | 'greater_than' | 'greater_or_equal_than' | 'less_than' | 'less_or_equal_than' | 'contains'. - `left`/`right` are EXPRESSION strings: a literal ("10", "Ainda não"), a variable ("{{score}}", "{{minha_var}}" = the screen's `variableName`), or arithmetic ("calc({{peso}}/(({{altura}}/100)*({{altura}}/100)))"). - Comparing an ANSWER: use `left: "{{<variableName of the deciding screen>}}"` and `right` = the option's `label` OR its `value` (both match). - `{{score}}` is the running sum of `points` on the options picked so far (`choices[].points`, `images[].points`) — that is how score-based branching works. - A navigation group with no conditions NEVER matches. `enabled: false` stores the rules but disables them. - Screen-level conditional display uses the same group shape: `logic.display = { enabled: true, groups: [...], showAfterSeconds?: n }` (`then` is ignored — THEN means "show"). - Other logic keys: `logic.autoAdvance = { enabled, delaySeconds? }`, `logic.navigationBehavior = { onButtonClick?, onAutoAdvance?, targetScreenId? }`. - `logic.conditionalNavigation` (legacy, pre-DEVF-161) is still read and migrated on load — don't author new rules with it. Unknown fields are REJECTED (they used to be stored and silently ignored): `logic` as an array, or `rules`/`branching`/`conditions`/`goto`/`jump`/`nextScreen` anywhere, are not read by any renderer.…
  • lowNo source repository listedmaint.no-repo
Overall 61/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

FoxForm reviews, tools and install