Is Snap Router MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 16 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 80/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Snap Router does
- Agent-Native DispatchCentral Slack/Telegram router with jobs, memory, approvals, and A2A delegationnot reviewedEstablishedA
- no_humanFile a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio.not reviewedEstablishedB
- lociCross-session memory and hybrid RAG over your notes and docs. Local-first, with cited answers.not reviewedEstablishedA