Is ThinkReview MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 176ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
- Maintenancelast push 13 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Overall 98/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what ThinkReview does
- WebanalyzerFree website analyzer: score any public URL 0-100 across 8 quality dimensions. No auth.not reviewedGrowingA
- PaxaverMCP adapter for the Paxaver school community platform. Streamable HTTP, OAuth 2.1, capability auth.not reviewedNewB
- MCP Server Auth TemplateOAuth 2.1/OIDC resource-server reference for secure MCP authorizationnot reviewedNewA