Is CloakBrowser MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- Code scan45 source files scanned; 45 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what CloakBrowser MCP does
- Vibe Test — Browser Testing AgentCode-aware browser testing agent — 13 Playwright tools for AI code editors via MCPnot reviewedGrowingB
GhostlightVisible local browser automation in signed-in Chromium, with optional policy and audit.not reviewedGrowingA- Session BridgeDrive a browser you are already signed into, through the free T3rnel Browser extension.not reviewedGrowingA