Is SparkVibeAI Spec Committee MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 776ms20/20
- Tool poisoning1 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityAPI key sent as a header8/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 67/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what SparkVibeAI Spec Committee does
- Mushi MushiBug translation for vibe coders: plain-English diagnosis + paste-ready fix in your AI coding agentnot reviewedGrowingA
- KLYPIX Project BrainActive state management for multi-agent coding: a shared, versioned project brain over MCP.not reviewedGrowingB
- SpecPilotGenerate and validate a .specs/ bundle for your repo, then hand it to your AI coding agentnot reviewedGrowingA