Is Mi Fitness Data Bridge MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityno auth information5/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 70/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Mi Fitness Data Bridge does
- RememLocal-first automatic memory for Claude Code and Codex: capture, distill, recall from SQLite.not reviewedEstablishedB
- remem-mcp — Local-first MCP Memory + CodeGraph + WikiLocal-first memory for AI coding agents. Memory + CodeGraph + Wiki in one SQLite file.not reviewedGrowingB
- LificLocal-first, lightweight issue tracker. Single binary, SQLite-backed, MCP-native.not reviewedGrowingA
