Is Legal Leap MCP（旧 政省令わかるくん） MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 832ms; handshake note: Streamable HTTP error: Error POSTing to endpoint: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"error":{"code":-32001,"message":"Authenticati20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 62/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Legal Leap MCP（旧 政省令わかるくん） does
- UK Legal ResearchUK legal research — case law, legislation, Hansard, bills, votes, committees, HMRC, citationsnot reviewedEstablishedA