Is Continuityguard MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan14 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 4 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truecontinuityguard_cli-0.1.7/src/continuityguard/ingest/ffmpeg.py: …t argument list to `subprocess` (never `shell=True`, never string concatenation into a she…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Continuityguard does
- OpusClipOpusClip MCP server — clip long-form videos, manage projects, collections, censor jobs, postsnot reviewedGrowingA
- CraftStoryTalking-avatar videos from a photo (CraftStory 2.0) and short clips with sound (MiniMax H3).not reviewedGrowingA
- ClipUGCCreate AI influencer characters, looks, video clips and merged UGC app ads with ClipUGC.not reviewedGrowingB