Is Recall — persistent memory for agents MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-21 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 191ms20/20
- Tool poisoning5 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 1 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (2)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write - lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 60/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Recall — persistent memory for agents does
- Total Agent MemoryPersistent local memory for coding agents: temporal knowledge graph, procedural and episodic recallnot reviewedEstablishedA
- Fidelis MemoryRecall locally stored agent memories through an MCP-compatible host.not reviewedGrowingB
- coldstartCodebase memory for AI agents: an AST index plus agent-written notes that self-stale.not reviewedGrowingA
Recall — persistent memory for agents reviews, tools and install