
Is person.work — Agent-maintained CV MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.7 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 3831ms17/20
- Tool poisoning4 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 65/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what person.work — Agent-maintained CV does
- MockserverMock, record/replay, verify and chaos-test any HTTP, REST, gRPC or LLM dependency over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Google SurfWeb, academic and code search with graph RAG, data lineage, ontology and cross-project schema links.not reviewedEstablishedB
- PDFAgentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.not reviewedEstablishedA
person.work — Agent-maintained CV reviews, tools and install