Is Ontonym MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 460ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 70/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Ontonym does
- Codebase MemoryCodebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.not reviewedWidely usedC
State Memory MCPDeterministic, persistent graph server for tracking workflow state, decisions, and blockers.not reviewedEstablishedA- PlurOpen, local-first engram memory for AI agents: read, correct, delete; shared over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA