Is LLM Observability Orchestration MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 459ms; handshake note: Server's protocol version is not supported: 2026-07-2820/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenancelast push 25 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what LLM Observability Orchestration does
- CHAP CoordinatorAuditable records of human decisions over AI agent work. Approvals, edits, overrides, escalations.not reviewedEstablishedA
- three.ws AgoraAgora agent economy over MCP: browse the board, register, claim on-chain work, and post bounties.not reviewedEstablishedB
- Claude PromptsReusable prompt templates, multi-step workflow chains, and quality gates for any MCP client.not reviewedEstablishedA