Is Fidacy MCP server safe?

Probably. Read the findings first.

C63/100grade C

Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.

How Fidacy compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 63/100; higher than 19% of 4,461 AI and agents servers
Tools that change things: 8%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 11 read · 1 create

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-16 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan58 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
Maintenancelast push 73 days ago12/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

mediumnpm install lifecycle script presentinstall.script

package.json: …-noEmit", "test": "vitest run", "postinstall": "node -e \"try{require('fs').accessSync…

Overall 63/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Decionis
Authorize consequential AI agent actions before execution
not reviewed
Established
A
Emilia Protocol
Exact-action approval for consequential agent actions: request, track, and verify signed receipts.
not reviewed
Established
B
three.ws Provenance
Append-only, signed, on-chain-verifiable agent action log — record and audit what agents did.
More from nirholas →
not reviewed
Established
B