Is LineBreak Gate & Spec Bridge MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan28 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; website matches verified namespace6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truelinebreak_gate-1.10.3/src/linebreak_gate/criteria_check.py: …return _execute(check["payload"], root, shell=True) raise CriteriaToolError(f"unknown …
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what LineBreak Gate & Spec Bridge does
- ContentrainGit-native content governance for AI agents — 27 deterministic MCP tools over stdio and HTTP.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Skills AnywhereDiscover and load Agent Skills from configured local directories and Git sources over stdio MCP.not reviewedGrowingA
- GntGit-native policy layer for AI agents: check_action verdicts against rules approved via PR.not reviewedGrowingA
