Is KitchenSink4Web MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan75 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalkitchensink4web-1.0.3/src/kitchensink4web/ops/diag.py: …ics` pack: console, page errors, script eval (DESIGN 2.2). Console logging shipped as…
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what KitchenSink4Web does
- ClickcastDrive a real Playwright browser: annotated screenshot + structured page state after every action.not reviewedGrowingB
domscoutdomscout browser API as MCP tools: screenshots, Markdown, structured data, page automation, crawls.not reviewedGrowingB- KitchenSink4WebBrowser MCP server: budgeted page reads, honest unread accounting, structured extraction.not reviewedNewB