Is Kangram MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-22 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 470ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityauth enforced (bearer)9/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 57/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Kangram does
- no_humanFile a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio.not reviewedEstablishedB
- chat-recallOne searchable history across every AI coding tool, with secret scanning and a shared task board.not reviewedGrowingB
AgentdocsAgentDocs (agentdocs.eu) MCP: read, search, write, comment, share & attach images to Markdown docs.not reviewedGrowingA