Is Auditable memory (memory3l) MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- Code scan8 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 65/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Auditable memory (memory3l) does
- Deja Vudeja-vu: local memory over the session histories of thirty-three coding agents.not reviewedEstablishedA
KnowlPersistent memory for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex. Facts retire when they change.not reviewedEstablishedA- PlurOpen, local-first engram memory for AI agents: read, correct, delete; shared over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA