Mmcp.market

Is RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A88/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 295ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning1 tool descriptions checked15/15
  • Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
  • Maintenancelast push 6 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action does

  • MCP
    Authorize consequential AI agent actions before execution
    A
  • Projectmem
    Coding agent memory — one local MCP server for every project. Warns before repeating failed fixes.
    A
  • Agent-Native Chat
    Minimal chat-first app with durable threads, actions, and the app-agent loop
    A

RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action reviews, tools and install