Is MCP Code Review Server MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan7 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-trueaicraft_code_review-0.1.2/src/mcp_code_review/reviewer.py: …"Use subprocess.run with args list, not shell=True", "command_injection"), (r"…
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what MCP Code Review Server does
- MCPProxyLocal-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savingsnot reviewedGrowingB
- Npm SentinelAdvanced NPM analysis: Recursive security scanning, ecosystem awareness, and deep insights.not reviewedGrowingA
TrentSecurity reviews, threat models over a repo or website, and remediation tracking, in your editor.not reviewedGrowingA