
Is FoxNose Knowledge MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.3 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 232ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityauth enforced (unknown)9/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 60/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what FoxNose Knowledge does
DocsMintCloud or self-hosted knowledge for AI agents: hybrid search, reranking, GraphRAG, scoped MCP tools.not reviewedEstablishedA- not reviewedEstablishedA
- Silica CoreRetrieval over the folder the session opened: files, search, read, code_pack, write_note.not reviewedEstablishedA