Is peek MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan79 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 78 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Findings (2)
- mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.script - mediumnpm install lifecycle script present
install.scriptpackage.json: …t": "vitest run --passWithNoTests", "postinstall": "node ./scripts/postinstall-guard.mjs" …
Overall 74/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what peek does
- ZenrowsZenrows MCP server — Fetch, Extract, Batch, and Browser Sessions for AI coding assistantsnot reviewedEstablishedA
- HwatuVerification browser for coding agents: headless WebKit, DOM eval, screenshots, pixel-diff.not reviewedGrowingA
- FeedthroughDebug bridge inside your web app: an agent reads the DOM, console and network. Any browser.not reviewedGrowingA