Is MCP Browser MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan63 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 43 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalsrc/actions/execute-javascript.js: …t wrap = async () => { const fn = new Function(`return (async () => { ${userScript} })(…
Overall 80/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what MCP Browser does
- nodriver — undetected browser automationUndetected anti-bot Chrome automation. 65 tools, parallel isolated browsers.not reviewedGrowingA
Slack MCP ServerCatch up on Slack without reading it. Unreads, threads, search. Browser-session or hosted OAuth.not reviewedEstablishedA- CloakBrowser MCPPlaywright MCP-compatible browser automation bridge for CloakBrowser Chromium.not reviewedEstablishedB