Is Loki Mode MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
How Loki Mode compares
Against every graded E-commerce MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 77/100
- higher than 55% of 2,174 E-commerce servers
- Tools that change things
- 12%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 36 read · 5 change
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-14, latest 2026-10-03, typically one every 19 days.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-15 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan555 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (2)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-trueautonomy/lib/workspace.py: …etup: s = subprocess.run(setup, shell=True, cwd=dest, capture_output=True, text=Tr…
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalautonomy/run.sh: … # v7.5.8: Strict whitelist before eval (mirrors app-runner.sh # …
Overall 77/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Loki Mode does
Ecommerce Trends MCPProduct and category demand trend volume over time, with growth signals. Free key at trendsmcp.ainot reviewedGrowingA- PostHog MCP ServerOfficial PostHog MCP Server for product analytics, feature flags, experiments, and more.not reviewedEstablishedA
- New-Term RadarNew AI model, product and repo names as they surface, and the search terms behind them, sized.not reviewedEstablishedB
