Is Figsnap MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-20 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- Code scan15 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 13 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Figsnap does
- PullzipInspect, search and safely extract zip/7z/rar/tar archives; repair garbled CJK file names.not reviewedNewB
- PreteWorks APIOne key for the document-to-web pipeline: scrape, AI-extract, build & edit PDFs, fill forms.not reviewedNewC
- BrightdataBright Data's Web MCP server enabling AI agents to search, extract & navigate the webnot reviewedEstablishedB