Is Vilix AI MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.5 · 2026-09-19 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 278ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 67/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Vilix AI does
- PlurOpen, local-first engram memory for AI agents: read, correct, delete; shared over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA
MemorixLocal-first project memory with legacy MCP and 2026 discovery compatibility.not reviewedEstablishedB- Deja Vudeja-vu: local memory over the session histories of thirty-three coding agents.not reviewedEstablishedA