Is Solsnap MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-22 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 135ms; handshake note: Streamable HTTP error: Unexpected content type: text/html; charset=utf-820/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ; website matches verified namespace5/10
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Solsnap does
- Unclaimed SolThe first Vibe Claiming MCP: AI agents scan and reclaim dormant SOL on Solana. Signs locally.not reviewedGrowingB
- SecobserveMCP server for SecObserve: triage findings, import scan reports and SBOMs, generate VEX.not reviewedGrowingB
- RadioChronLocal-first Wi-Fi incident diagnostics with native BLE scan, history, and risk evidence.not reviewedGrowingA