Is Agent Spend Guard — owner-set purchasing guardrails MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
What to know before installing
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 301ms20/20
- Tool poisoning4 tool descriptions checked15/15
- Auth qualityopen endpoint exposes 2 write-action tools with no auth3/15
- Maintenancerepository not readable: repo not found3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (1)
- highWrite-action tools reachable without authentication
auth.open-write
Overall 60/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Agent Spend Guard — owner-set purchasing guardrails does
- three.ws AutopilotSet autopilot scopes and a daily SOL spend cap, then propose, execute, and undo agent actions.not reviewedEstablishedB
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Ask LLMUnified MCP server for Gemini, Codex, Claude, Grok, Ollama, and Antigravitynot reviewedGrowingB
Agent Spend Guard — owner-set purchasing guardrails reviews, tools and install