Head to head
WP HealthKit vs Feishu User Plugin
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security audits for WordPress plugins and themes — 62 verification layers, fix plans and SBOMs.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Feishu/Lark MCP server + CLI tool. 85 tools, 3 auth layers. Send as user via cookie+protobuf.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours WP HealthKit (87/100 against 57). WP HealthKit is hosted and callable through the gateway; Feishu User Plugin runs on your own machine.
| WP HealthKit | Feishu User Plugin | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 10 |
| Downloads / week | 24 | 132 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 85 |
| Write actions | — | 32 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-07 | 2026-08-02 |
| Category | Security | Security |